Sarah had been staring at her laptop for two hours when she finally admitted something was wrong. Her essay question asked her to evaluate how economic growth affects living standards, but every time she tried to incorporate GDP data, it felt forced. She kept writing things like "GDP measures economic output" and "inflation reduces purchasing power

James stared at his laptop screen, the cursor blinking mockingly in the empty document. The brief was clear enough: analyze a real-world example of behavioral economics in action, applying relevant theories and demonstrating critical understanding. But as he scrolled through his notes on prospect theory and mental accounting, nothing seemed to clic

It was 10:30 PM, and Zara was pacing her room, earbuds still in from a mock viva she'd recorded an hour earlier. Her supervisor had given her minimal feedback, "Good content, work on delivery" and now she was spiraling. Would the examiners ask about methodology? Would they challenge her literature review? Would they even like her? She wa

It’s the kind of email that freezes a student mid-scroll: “Your submission contains 37% similarity.” No context. No explanation. Just a number that looms large. The student rereads the essay they thought was safe. Everything had been cited at least they believed it was. So what went wrong? This moment isn’t rare. It reflects the widespr

The room had gone quiet after Mara shared her proposed intervention. A third-year nursing student in the FPX 4900 course, she had spent weeks reviewing academic journals, drawing connections between national guidelines and her community placement. But when her preceptor asked how the plan would land with the elderly patients she was targeting, she